「紅猴股評」Twitter - 發放有用資訊、短評、感想及股票推介(加入請按此)
恒指果然於20,000這心理關口徘徊,但心理關口就是心理關口,絕不實際,起到的效果不會長久!投資者還是留意一年前留下的蟹貨區阻力更實際。
下圖為恒指近三年走勢,去年首半年,恒指曾反彈至26,000,之後一直下跌至6月尾,於7月才再反彈,當時不少投資者以為雙底支持強,於21,000至23,000入貨憧憬恒指見底,怎知恒指遇23,000便調頭急跌,加上21,000至23,000為去年大跌市前的成交密集區,不少投資者於此位「蟹」了,等了至少一年,再遇此後,這些蟹貨怎會不空群而出,成為大市向上的阻力!就算衝破,25,000的阻力將更大。
(按一下下圖可放大)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a8cd/9a8cd88b8c6416c2ee209cf10b9a9590fd5db577" alt=""
相同道理,國指的蟹貨區阻力為12,000至13,000,15,000的阻力將更大!
(按一下下圖可放大)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aefa6/aefa6ef96ec4653e878e971394e78b5a70ac873c" alt=""
理性與感性(續)
筆者上篇股評題為「投資者若太過理性,最終只會一事無成!」試想投資者若因很理性地認為金融海嘯威力無窮,經濟那有能力那麼快復甦為由而今年仍不作投資,應已錯失了過往4個月的大升浪!閱報得知前Morgan Stanley著名分析大師Barton Biggs曾說過「At crucial turning point observe what markets do and ignore what the experts and the commentators say about what is going on.」不要忽視市場這集體智慧的威力!
筆者投資傾向理性,但盡量避免太過理性,就是清楚這個道理。眾多行業股票的股價走勢中,以地產股及資源股波動最大,最不理性,亦因筆者於投資的非理性還未調較到這地步,筆者有自知之明下,已鮮有投資這類股票,就算有亦只是小試牛刀,看看自己的心理調較可否跟得上這類股票的走勢。
所以,投資者要作符合自己性格的投資,一是調整自己的性格,一是調整自己的投資取向,通常後者較易。試想性格保守的投資者經常炒出炒入三四線股,結果會是災難性的!
可是,性格進取的投資者又不是等於適合炒出炒入三四線股,若他們這樣做只是高估自己的不理性,低估投資市場的風高浪急!若投資者若太過感性呢?很簡單,請問一問自己,商業世界及投資市場是否一個充滿感情的地方?投資者若太過感性,請不要自己作投資決定,因為這樣做必定一事無成!
投資組合
投資組合回報再度衝破180%,以投資期約3年7個月計,每年平均複式回報為33%,尤以經歷金融海嘯下,筆者已很滿意此成績!
(按一下下圖可放大)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aa58/8aa5806bb32204b232927ad457d1a2513abe8467" alt=""
(Contact: redmonkey@redmonkey.hk)
Dear Red money:
ReplyDeleteCould you provide us with the value of 2038富士康 and 2366勤+緣 at year 2012, please?
Thank you very much !
It is difficult to estimate the expected EPS of 2038. It seems that its business prospect is still not stable with continuous earnings alert.
ReplyDeleteI wonder why so many people are interested in 2366 or all the requests come from the same person indeed. The answer is same as before. I will not give valuation to a company without creditability.
A company with continuous and steady growth in turnover and profits (but also account receivables) in the past years and then suddenly made a large provision in one year, just demonstrates that its accounting figures are artificial and cannot be trusted.
Redmonkey
Dear Redmoney
ReplyDelete之前係$4左右入了京客隆,適逢謝清海月內增持二次,現在都去到一個唔錯的價位,想請教下為何將它的估值pe調高到15? 冇記錯的話原本估值pe都冇咁高,可否解釋一下,是否基金增持就set高估值pe?謝!
Vincent
Dear Red money:
ReplyDeleteCan you command 1186 and 390? You think which one is better?
Regards,
Alan Yue